All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
Mutation testing in AML:
What you need to know
with Charles Craddock, Ralph Hills, and Gail Roboz
Wednesday, April 23, 2025
17:30-18:30 BST
This independent educational activity is supported by Thermo Fisher Scientific. All content is developed independently by the faculty. The funder is allowed no influence on the content.
The AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology and Syndax, and has been supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Anna B. Halpern from Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, and colleagues conducted a phase I/II trial (NCT02044796) of G-CSF, cladribine, high-dose cytarabine, and dose-escalated mitoxantrone (GCLAM) in adults with newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The results of the study were published online in the April 2018 issue of Leukemia .
In total, 121 patients (median age = 60 years, range 21–81) were enrolled. Of them, 84 patients (69%) had AML, 14 patients (12%) had MDS with excess blasts-2 (MDS-EB-2), 3 patients (2%) had blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN), and 20 (17%) had a treatment-related myeloid neoplasm (t-AML in 15, t-MDS in 5). The phase I proportion of the study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Thirty-three patients were enrolled in the phase I portion of the study and received either 12 (dose level [DL] 1), 14 (DL2), 16 (DL3) or 18 (DL4) mg/m2/day of mitoxantrone on Day 1–3 as part of GCLAM, for cohorts including 6–12 patients.
The phase II proportion of the study aimed to examine response and duration of remission rates at the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Ninety-four patients received GCLAM at the RP2D. Median follow-up was 1.92 years.
The authors also compared the outcomes of this phase I/II study to two historical controls. The GCLAM group were first compared with patients (n = 100, median age = 56 years) who were treated at the Fred Hutchison Cancer Center with 7 + 3 at daunorubicin doses ≥ 60 mg/m2 or idarubicin doses ≥ 10 mg/m2 .
Matched patients from the GCLAM (n = 34) group was also compared to 245 matched patients (median age < 60) treated with “7 + 3” on SWOG S0106 study.
In conclusion, these findings showed that GCLAM with mitoxantrone at 18 mg/m2/day is “safe” and induces high-quality remissions in patients with newly-diagnosed AML. The authors highlighted that “the seeming superiority of GCLAM over 7 + 3 was observed with CR with MRD and CRi with/without MRD, as well as with CR without MRD”. Halpern et al. further added that “a 3-arm randomized trial might compare “7 + 3”, FLAGIda, and GCLAM to decide which is best for future use as intensive induction chemotherapy regimen”.
Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox