All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
Mutation testing in AML:
What you need to know
with Charles Craddock, Ralph Hills, and Gail Roboz
Wednesday, April 23, 2025
17:30-18:30 BST
This independent educational activity is supported by Thermo Fisher Scientific. All content is developed independently by the faculty. The funder is allowed no influence on the content.
The AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology and Syndax, and has been supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
In a Letter to the Editor of Haematologica, Anna B. Halpern and colleagues from the University of Washington, Seattle, US, reported data from a phase I/II study (NCT02044796) of cladribine, high-dose cytarabine, mitoxantrone, and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) with dose-escalated mitoxantrone (CLAG-M) for patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or other high-grade myeloid neoplasms.
Between February 2014 and April 2017, 60 patients (median age = 61 years; range: 33–77) with a treatment-related mortality score of ≤ 6.9 (corresponds to a ≤ 6.9 probability of 4-week mortality) were enrolled in this study. In the phase I portion of this study, 26 patients in groups of 6–12 received 12, 14, 16 or 18 mg/m2 of intravenous (IV) mitoxantrone on days 1–3. G-CSF was given subcutaneously on days 0–5, cladribine IV at 5 mg/m2 (days 1–5), and cytarabine IV at 2 g/m2 (days 1–5).
In the phase II stage of the study, 40 patients (median age = 63 years; range: 33–77), including six patients enrolled in the phase I portion received CLAG-M with mitoxantrone at the RP2D.
In order to investigate whether escalation of mitoxantrone increases the anti-leukemic efficacy of CLAG-M, the outcomes of 51 patients (including 40 patients treated at RP2D and 11 patients treated off-study) treated with CLAG-M with mitoxantrone at 16 mg/m2 were compared to 30 patients (all treated off study) treated with CLAG-M with mitoxantrone at 10 mg/m2. In addition, outcomes of this study were compared to other high-dose regimens including GCLAC (GCSF/clofarabine/cytarabine; n = 56) and decitabine-primed MEC (d/MEC: decitabine/mitoxantrone/etoposide/cytarabine; n = 36).
CLAG-M with escalated mitoxantrone up to 16 mg/m2 “appears safe and relatively well tolerated in fit younger and older adults with RR AML and other high-grade myeloid neoplasms.” The key limitation of the study includes the small sample size.
Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox